Skip to content
AIEngineersLabs
RAG Systems

Production retrieval that cites its sourcesor doesn’t ship.

A RAG demo is two days of work. A RAG system that survives audit, version control, and quarterly evals is a different category. We build the second one — with hybrid retrieval, cross-encoder reranking, citation enforcement, and an eval harness your team runs after we leave.

RAG (retrieval-augmented generation) is how enterprises ship LLM features against private data without fine-tuning. The hard problems are not “wire up a vector database” — they are chunking, retrieval quality, hallucination control, citation accuracy, eval drift, and governance. We’ve shipped RAG systems for Tier-1 banks, government, and global insurers. Every one cites sources. Every one passes eval gates before deploy.

What you get

Outcomes, not artefacts.

  • A production RAG system

    Ingestion pipeline, vector store, hybrid retrieval, reranker, generation, citation layer, observability — all running in your environment.

  • An eval harness

    Golden-set evaluation, retrieval metrics (hit rate, MRR, NDCG), generation metrics (faithfulness, answer relevancy), CI integration that blocks regressions.

  • A runbook

    How to retrain rerankers, refresh the corpus, debug a bad answer, audit a citation, rotate models. Owned by your team after handover.

  • A clean handover

    Your team owns the system after week 12. We don't sit on top of it. Steady-state engagement is optional, not built-in.

  • Compliance posture

    Region-locked deployments, audit logging, PII redaction, model attestations. SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, HIPAA where the engagement requires it.

What we ship

Specifics, because ‘the latest tools’ means nothing.

Chunking
Semantic chunking with structural awareness — headings, tables, lists. Not naive 512-token splits.
Embeddings
OpenAI text-embedding-3-large by default; open-weights (BGE, Nomic) where residency or cost requires it.
Vector store
Qdrant or Postgres + pgvector. Pinecone where the team already runs it. Hybrid retrieval = vector + BM25 + filters.
Reranking
Cross-encoder reranking (Cohere Rerank, BGE-reranker, or fine-tuned in-domain). Reranking is not optional in production.
Generation
Claude / GPT / open-weights with provider routing and fallback. Structured output with citation tagging at the prompt layer.
Eval
Golden-set retrieval evals + LLM-as-judge for faithfulness. Run on every PR. Block deploy on regression.
Observability
Langfuse or custom OTEL pipeline. Per-query traces, retrieval scores, eval results, cost telemetry.
Engagement model

How it runs

Timeline8–14 weeks to production
Pod size1 architect · 2 engineers · 1 MLOps
DeliverablesSystem · eval harness · runbook · handover
Pricing postureFixed-scope, milestone-based, or pod retainer
Proof
A Tier-1 bank's corporate banking team reviewed contracts manually — six hours per contract. We shipped a RAG system with citation gating and human review. Median review time fell to ~95 minutes (a 73% reduction) with zero unsupported claims in the audit window.

Tier-1 bank · Corporate banking RAG · Citation-gated

Live demo

Ask the system about itself.

The demo runs against AIEngineersLabs’s own service documentation. Every answer shows the chunks it retrieved, the rerank score, and a citation back to the source. In production this same interface runs against a Qdrant collection with a real LLM.

RAG demo · over our own docs
Try one of these

Pick a question above. The retrieval result and citations will appear here.

Frequently asked

What buyers actually ask

Do you use LangChain or LlamaIndex?
Where it fits. We've shipped on both, and we've shipped without either when the orchestration was simpler than the framework. We pick based on what the operating team will own, not what's trending.
Which vector database do you recommend?
Default to Qdrant for new builds — it scales, has clean filtering, and the operations are well-understood. Postgres + pgvector when the team already runs Postgres and the corpus is under ~10M chunks. Pinecone when the team already pays for it and the migration cost isn't worth it.
How do you measure retrieval quality?
Hit rate at k, MRR, NDCG on a curated golden set, plus retrieval-conditioned generation evals (faithfulness, answer relevancy) using LLM-as-judge. Eval methodology is documented in the playbook.
What's the eval harness specifically?
A test runner — Python + pytest typically — that replays a golden set on every PR, computes retrieval and generation metrics, and blocks merges on regression. We hand the harness over so your team can extend it.
Next step

Talk to an engineer, not a salesperson.

30 minutes. No slides. Bring an architecture, a stalled roadmap, or a vendor proposal you want a second opinion on. We'll tell you what we'd do.